Seite 1 von 1
					
				Objects/scheme suggestions
				Verfasst: 19.03.2010, 12:18
				von vlad_1
				all important . not only new units and parameters . 
new sound -realistic war sounds very important 
new buildings -very important -, like new objects - with this game much better
 
 

 
			
					
				Re: Coming Soon..... RWM 6.8 - The Final Stand
				Verfasst: 19.03.2010, 12:26
				von 2wk
				Ja, ich hoffe auch auf viele neue Objekte, aber auch Einheiten als Objekt! (z.B. permanent brennende Objekte)
Sowas belebt einfach das Spielgeschehen! 

 
			
					
				Re: Coming Soon..... RWM 6.8 - The Final Stand
				Verfasst: 19.03.2010, 13:03
				von vlad_1
				
			 
			
					
				Re: Coming Soon..... RWM 6.8 - The Final Stand
				Verfasst: 19.03.2010, 13:25
				von HunButyok
				Cool picture but bergepanzer 38(t) never fought in stalingrad.
http://www.picatom.com/1c/img/stalingrad2-1.JPG 
			
					
				Re: Coming Soon..... RWM 6.8 - The Final Stand
				Verfasst: 19.03.2010, 13:34
				von vlad_1
				
			 
			
					
				Re: Coming Soon..... RWM 6.8 - The Final Stand
				Verfasst: 19.03.2010, 13:34
				von vlad_1
				
			 
			
					
				Re: Objects/scheme suggestions
				Verfasst: 19.03.2010, 19:51
				von HunButyok
				http://www.picatom.com/1d/img/vlad_Stal ... ter7-1.jpg
In this picture I can see a british 17 pdr AT-gun. 
It was NEVER in soviet service!
I think the history is more important than the new objects.
Bergepanzer 38(t) in Stalingrad and 17 pdr AT-gun in soviet service... It is terrible!  

 
			 
			
					
				Re: Objects/scheme suggestions
				Verfasst: 19.03.2010, 20:18
				von vlad_1
				i show just new objects .
imposible create full history in game .
Bergepanzer 38(t)
this is not important
a british 17 pdr AT-gun. It was NEVER in soviet service!
i change on new - also with this gun i show only leand lease(this is not important) 
I think the history is more important than the new objects.
how you create history in game ?. 
all important not only units
 
			
					
				Re: Objects/scheme suggestions
				Verfasst: 19.03.2010, 21:08
				von HunButyok
				"also with this gun i show only leand lease"
17 pdr AT-gun never was lend-lease weapon. Red Army recieved only few pieces of 6 pdr (57 mm) at-guns in 1941. But british AT-guns never were used by red Army in large numbers. But the lend-lease 6 pdr AT-gun is not the 17 pdr AT-gun.
"this is not important"
Yes, it is important. Battle for 
Stalingrad was between 1942 july to 1943 february. From October of 1944, 106 Bergepanzer 38(t) built.  The bergepanzer 38(t) built after Stalingrad (
one and half year later). If you use Bergepanzer 38(t) in Stalingrad you can use Starcraft spaceships too. 
 
"how you create history in game ?. "
Before I make a mod and I make a single or multiplayer mission, I read books and I read articles on the internet.  

 
			
					
				Re: Objects/scheme suggestions
				Verfasst: 19.03.2010, 21:21
				von HunButyok
				If you need help in historical information, write me.
Here are the lend-lease AT guns:
37mm Anti-Tank (american 37 mm M3 AT-gun) 35 pieces in late 1942.
57mm Anti-Tank (British QF 6 pdr. AT-gun and american M1 AT-gun) 375 pieces in 1943.
Total numbers of lend-lease AT-guns: 410 pieces. 
Note: 76,2 mm QF 17 pdr AT-gun never was lend-lease weapon.
			 
			
					
				Re: Objects/scheme suggestions
				Verfasst: 20.03.2010, 15:31
				von Baron_von_Peter
				Der Reichstag is zu klein  

 
			
					
				Re: Objects/scheme suggestions
				Verfasst: 20.03.2010, 18:17
				von Oberst Ellmann
				schön schön
Lang lebe Blitzkrieg ähm RWM  
 
 
nein spaß, sieht sehr gut aus!
Und der Reichsttag ist wirklich etwas zu klein ... hm 
Aber macht weiter so! sehr schick alles!
 
			
					
				Re: Objects/scheme suggestions
				Verfasst: 20.03.2010, 18:45
				von -Barbarossa-
				Oh man, das kommt davon.... die Pics haben rein gar nichts mit RWM zu tun.
Entweder ist das der RWG Mod oder der Liberation Mod!
Werde das Thema nochmal woanders hin verschieben müssen...
			 
			
					
				Re: Objects/scheme suggestions
				Verfasst: 20.03.2010, 18:58
				von Oberst Ellmann
				solltest du wirklich ^^ 
sonst kommen schnell missverständnisse auf  
